![]() Hispanic Republicans lived nine miles from the city while Hispanic Democrats lived seven miles from the city. Among college degree holders, Republicans lived 17 miles from the city while Democrats lived 10 miles from the city. The physical urban-rural gap was smaller among racial and ethnic groups and those who have higher education and higher income. In terms of distance from a large metropolitan city, their analysis showed that, on average, Republicans lived 20 miles from a city, while independents lived 17 miles away and Democrats lived 12 miles away. The environment around us - the distance we live away from a metropolitan area and population density - shapes what we think about the political world and the partisan labels we adopt.” “And that is the main takeaway from our research. On the other hand, we tend to overlook how the social environment -outside of race, gender and income - plays a role in our partisan identity,” Moy said. Life experiences shape our perceptions of the world. “On the one hand, our findings should not surprise anyone. ![]() Likewise, their analysis suggests that a person living in a densely packed community is about 11 points more likely to identify as a strong Democrat compared with that same person living in a sparsely populated area. Moy, a PhD candidate in the political science department, along with two University of Maryland co-authors, found that geography is related to substantial differences in partisanship even after accounting for a host of individual traits like age, race, gender, education and religious adherence.įor instance, holding all other individual characteristics constant, an individual’s probability of identifying as a strong Democrat drops by 12 percentage points if they live in a far rural area. In their research analysis, Reeves and Bryant J. “However, our research found that the explanation was not that simple.” “The general consensus has been that the origins of this divide lie within the personal characteristics of the people who live in rural or urban communities. Reeves, associate professor of political science in Arts & Sciences. “Urban-rural differences in partisan political loyalty is as familiar in the United States as they are in other countries,” said study co-author Andrew J. The paper will be published in an upcoming issue of Political Behavior. How close people live to a major metropolitan area, defined as cities of at least 100,000, and their town’s population density play a significant role in shaping their political beliefs and partisan affiliation. The researchers, using Gallup survey data between 2003-18, found evidence that the urban-rural political divide - more noticeable and decisive in recent elections - is rooted in geography and not merely differences in the type of people living in these places. Louis political scientists finds that it isn’t personal profiles, but rather proximity to bigger cities that drives the political divide. A new study by Washington University in St. The divide between urban and rural voters in the United States is nothing new, but its cause has been less clear.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |